Cook v. Hardy
708 N.W.2d 115, 474 Mich. 1010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. Hardy. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 878 →
Opinion
Elizabeth A. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Christopher W. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On January 12, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the judgment of the Ingham Circuit Court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent. MCR 7.302(G)(1).
WEAVER and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. Hardy, 708 N.W.2d 115, 474 Mich. 1010 (Mich. 2006).
708 N.W.2d 115 (Cook v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State
708 N.W.2d 115 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2005)