Cook v. Hardy
This text of 708 N.W.2d 115 (Cook v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elizabeth A. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Christopher W. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On January 12, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the judgment of the Ingham Circuit Court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent. MCR 7.302(G)(1).
WEAVER and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 N.W.2d 115, 474 Mich. 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-hardy-mich-2006.