Cook v. Hardy
This text of 704 N.W.2d 696 (Cook v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elizabeth A. COOK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Christopher W. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatement of arguments in application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 N.W.2d 696, 474 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-hardy-mich-2005.