Cook v. Baker

214 P.2d 787, 121 Colo. 187, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 297
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 17, 1950
Docket16401
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 214 P.2d 787 (Cook v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Baker, 214 P.2d 787, 121 Colo. 187, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 297 (Colo. 1950).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Hays

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an original proceeding in this court under the, provisions of section 1, chapter 147, S. L. ’41, and initiated by petition in which it is recited, in substance, that on December 20, 1949, petitioners filed with the secretary of state an original and copy of a petition for a proposed initiative amendment to the state Constitution for the purpose of having fixed by an administrative [188]*188board consisting of the secretary of state, attorney general, and reporter of the supreme court, a title and “ballot title and submission clause,” as by law provided.

The proposed initiative amendment is as follows:

“Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Colorado:

“Section 1. Section 13 of Article XII of the Constitution of the State of Colorado is hereby amended to read as follows:

“Section 13. State Civil Service.—Permanent appointments and promotions in the state civil service shall be made according to merit and fitness, to be ascertained by examination, subject to the provisions of Section 14 of this article relating to veterans’ preference. Persons in the state civil service shall hold permanent appointments during efficient service and shall be retired according to law.

“The state civil service shall include all permanent appointive positions in the state government, except that positions held by the following persons shall be excluded, to-wit: Officers and employees of the legislative and judicial departments, and persons appointed to perform judicial functions; members of boards, commissions, councils and committees; his administrative staff of secretaries, administrative assistants, stenographers, clerks and messengers, selected by the governor; one deputy and one secretary selected by each elective officer; appointees to fill vacancies in elective offices; officers, teachers and employees of the educational institutions and departments thereof; officers, members and employees of the state militia; heads of administrative departments created pursuant to Section 15 of this article.

“Laws shall be made to enforce the provisions of this section. Existing laws and regulations not in conflict herewith shall continue in effect until changed. All persons holding permanent appointments in the state civil service, as herein defined, when this section takes [189]*189effect, shall retain their permanent appointments in accordance with the provisions of this section.

“There shall be a civil service commission of three members, not more than two of whom shall be members of the same political party, appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate for six year overlapping terms expiring January 31st of odd numbered years, and removable by the governor for cause.

“Section 2. Article XII of the Constitution of the • State of Colorado is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section reading as fhllows:

“Section 15. Administrative Departments and Heads Thereof.—All permanent executive .and administrative offices, departments and instrumentalities of the state government, except the governor,' his administrative staff, and the lieutenant governor, and their respective functions, powers and duties, shall be allocated by law among and within not .more than 20 administrative departments. The head of each administrative department shall be a single executive who shall be (1) an elective officer of the executive department of the state or, (2) an officer appointed by an elective board, or (3) an officer appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate, and serving during the pleasure of the governor, but Subject to the right of the governor, when the senate is not in session, to make a temporary appointment until the next session of the senate, or (4) an officer appointed by an appointive board or commission, with the approval of the governor, and serving during the pleasure of the governor.”

On December 28, 1949, two members of the said administrative board, the Supreme Court Reporter being absent, fixed the following title for said initiative amendment, to wit: “An Act To Amend Article XII of the Constitution of the State of Colorado, Relating to the State Civil Service” and also fixed the following ballot title and submission clause, to wit: “An act to amend article XII of the Constitution of the State of [190]*190Colorado, (1) by amending section 13 thereof providing for the making of permanent appointments and promotions in the state civil service according to merit and fitness, to be ascertained by examination, subject to the provisions of section 14 of said article; providing for the holding of permanent appointments by persons in the state civil service during efficient service and for the retirement of such persons; providing for the inclusion in the state civil service of all permanent appointive positions in the state government but for the exclusion therefrom of certain designated persons; providing for the making of laws for the enforcement of said section; providing, until changed, for the continuing effectiveness of existing laws and regulations not in conflict with said section; providing for the retention in their permanent appointments in accordance with the provisions of said section, of all persons holding permanent appointments in the state civil service, when said section, as amended, becomes effective; and providing for a civil service commission of three members, prescribing their qualifications, method of appointment and confirmation, term of office and method of removal; and (2) further to amend said article XII by adding thereto a new section to be known and numbered as section 15 providing for- the allocation by law among and within not more than twenty administrative departments, of all permanent executive and administrative offices, departments and instrumentalities of the state government, excépt the governor, his administrative staff, and the lieutenant governor, and of their respective functions, powers and duties, and providing that the head of each such administrative department shall be a single executive who shall be (1) an elective officer of the executive department of the state, or (2) an officer appointed by an elective board, or (3) an officer appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate, and' serving during his pleasure, but subject to the right of the governor, when the senate is not in [191]*191session, to make a temporary appointment until the next session of the senate, or (4) an officer appointed by an appointive board or commission, with the approval of the governor and serving during his pleasure.”

On December 30, 1949, said petitioners protested said title and ballot title and submission clause, and petitioned said board for a rehearing thereon. The objection made to the title of said initiative amendment was to the effect that, inasmuch as article XII of the Constitution relates to officers as well as to the state civil service, that said proposed title should be amended by inserting therein the word “officers.” We think the objection to the title to the proposed initiative amendment is without merit, and it is therefore denied.

The principal controversy herein relates to the validity of the ballot title and submission clause above set forth, and most of the oral argument on both sides was devoted to that question;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)
2014 MT 76 (Montana Supreme Court, 2014)
Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. Greene
886 P.2d 1338 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1994)
FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. Greene
886 P.2d 1338 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1994)
Matter of Educ. Tax Refund
823 P.2d 1353 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1992)
In re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary
757 P.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1988)
Matter of Proposed Constitutional Amend.
757 P.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1988)
City of Glendale v. Buchanan
578 P.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1978)
Cook v. Baker
214 P.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 P.2d 787, 121 Colo. 187, 1950 Colo. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-baker-colo-1950.