Contreras v. State

645 S.W.2d 298, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 921
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 1983
Docket1006-82
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 645 S.W.2d 298 (Contreras v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Contreras v. State, 645 S.W.2d 298, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 921 (Tex. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This cause is before us on appellant’s petition for discretionary review, the Court of Appeals having affirmed his conviction for aggravated assault after a Motion to Proceed to Adjudication was found to be true by the trial court.

However, in Williams v. State, 592 S.W.2d 931 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), we held that under the terms of Article 42.12, § 3d(b), V.A.C.C.P., no appeal may be taken from the hearing in which the trial court determines to proceed with an adjudication of guilt on the original charge. See Wright v. State, 592 S.W.2d 604 (Tex.Cr.App.1980) and Daniels v. State, 615 S.W.2d 771 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Accordingly, the purported appeal should have never been entertained by the Court of Appeals. Therefore, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hogans v. State
176 S.W.3d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Hogans, Keith Lashone
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005
Kenneth Eugene Foster v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998
Russell v. State
831 S.W.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Castro v. State
807 S.W.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Garcia v. State
769 S.W.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Jackson v. State
760 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Pipkin v. State
750 S.W.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Eldridge v. State
731 S.W.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Fielding v. State
719 S.W.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Homan v. Hughes
708 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Hill v. State
704 S.W.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Loggins v. State
701 S.W.2d 51 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Day v. State
693 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Johnson v. State
694 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Seals v. State
691 S.W.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Roberson v. State
688 S.W.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Hooks v. State
659 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Peppard v. State
653 S.W.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 S.W.2d 298, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contreras-v-state-texcrimapp-1983.