Continental Oil Company and Charles B. Wrightsman v. Federal Power Commission and United Gas Pipe Line Company

285 F.2d 527
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 20, 1961·No. 18571·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition seeks the review of a telegraphic order of the Federal Power Commission addressed to Continental Oil Company reading: “Your petition for declaratory order and order to show cause be and is hereby denied by direction of the Commission.” That order merely denied the petitioners discretionary declaratory relief and the petitioners are not aggrieved thereby. This Court has no jurisdiction to review the Commission’s refusal to issue such a declaratory order. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 78. See also, Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 1938, 304 U.S. 375, 384, 58 S.Ct. 963, 82 L.Ed. 1408. The petition for review is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Oil Company and Charles B. Wrightsman v. Federal Power Commission and United Gas Pipe Line Company, 285 F.2d 527 (5th Cir. 1961).

285 F.2d 527 (Continental Oil Company and Charles B. Wrightsman v. Federal Power Commission and United Gas Pipe Line Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission
474 A.2d 1274 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
A-1 Coach Tours, Inc. v. United States
260 F. Supp. 295 (E.D. New York, 1966)
W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. McAndrew
226 F. Supp. 860 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)