Continental Insurance v. Rosenberg
74 A. 1073, 23 Del. 174, 7 Penne. 174, 1909 Del. LEXIS 7
Opinion
We have carefully considered the several assignments of error in this case. And we are unanimously of the opinion that the learned Court below, in a very careful and comprehensive charge to the jury, correctly announced the law upon every essential element in the case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed on the opinion of the Court below. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Continental Insurance v. Rosenberg, 74 A. 1073, 23 Del. 174, 7 Penne. 174, 1909 Del. LEXIS 7 (Del. 1909).
74 A. 1073 (Continental Insurance v. Rosenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Onderko v. LM General Insurance Company
M.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
Pfizer Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company
Superior Court of Delaware, 2019
Coppi v. West American Insurance
524 N.W.2d 804 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1994)
Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North America
384 A.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1978)
Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ponsell's Drug Stores, Inc.
202 A.2d 271 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1964)
Holtz v. New York Life Insurance
179 A. 497 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1935)
Kelmenson v. British America Assurance Co.
171 S.E. 904 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1933)
Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. Co. of Mansfield v. Johnson Lumber Co.
53 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)
Northern Assurance Co. v. Rachlin Clothes Shop, Inc.
125 A. 184 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1924)
Cohen v. Home Insurance
95 A. 912 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1915)
Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Eisman
1915 OK 14 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
National Bank v. Lindsay
78 A. 407 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1910)