Continental Casualty v. Staffing Concepts
This text of Continental Casualty v. Staffing Concepts (Continental Casualty v. Staffing Concepts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
Argued January 7, 2008 Decided January 11, 2008
Before
Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 07-2475
Continental Casualty Co., American Appeal from the United States District Casualty Co. of Reading, Court for the Northern District Pennsyl vania, Transportation of Illinois, Eastern Division Insurance Co., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 06 C 5473
v. Ronald A. Guzman, Judge. Staffing Concepts, Inc., Staffing Concepts Nat’l, Inc., Staffing Concepts Int’l, Inc., Ventures Resources Group, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
The appeal is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A) & (B); Middleby Corp. v. Hussman Corp., 962 F.2d 614, 616 (7th Cir. 1992) (barring appeal when an order denying a petition is “a delay incident to an orderly process”); IDS Life Ins. Co. v. SunAmerica, Inc., 103 F.3d 524, 526-27 (7th Cir. 1996) (extending Middleby to denials of an order to arbitrate under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A)). An opinion will follow.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Continental Casualty v. Staffing Concepts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-casualty-v-staffing-concepts-ca7-2008.