Continental Baking Corp. v. Commissioner

30 B.T.A. 354, 1934 BTA LEXIS 1340
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 1934
DocketDocket No. 61603.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 B.T.A. 354 (Continental Baking Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Baking Corp. v. Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 354, 1934 BTA LEXIS 1340 (bta 1934).

Opinion

[355]*355OPINION.

Marquette:

The issue to be decided is whether the capital stock tax of the Bakeries Service Corporation accrued in 1925 or in 1929, [356]*356in which latter year the respondent determined it was not exempt from such tax. If it was a proper accrual for 1929 the petitioner prevails; otherwise, it is not entitled to deduct the amount of the tax in its income tax return for that year. Russell-Miller Milling Co., 27 B.T.A. 405; aff'd., 67 Fed. (2d) 392. The applicable provisions of the Revenue Act of 1924 and of the respondent’s regulations are set forth in the margin.1

The petitioner maintains that inasmuch as the capital stock tax return filed claimed the corporation was exempt as one not “ engaged in business ” and by the regulations “ the determination of liability rests with the Commissioner ”, this decision of liability by the Commissioner was a “ fact ” necessary to fix the liability, and no tax could be said to have accrued until such decision was made. There appears to be no dispute between the parties as to the law of the case. They both cite and rely upon practically the same decisions, but differ in their application. The question is narrowed then to this: Was the determination of liability by the respondent such an event or fact as would postpone the accrual of the liability until such determination was made? We are constrained to answer this question in the negative. At June 30, 1925, all the facts existed and were known upon which the liability to the tax was to be predicated; it was then ascertainable as a matter of law whether the corporation was “ carrying on or doing business ” within the intent and meaning of the statute, and we do not think the incidence of the tax or its accrual could be postponed by the filing of a return in which exemption from the tax was claimed.

Since the accounts were kept on the accrual basis, the liability became fixed at July 1, 1925, if the corporation was not exempt, and it having been so determined by the respondent, the liability'' to the tax accrued in 1925 and not in 1929. United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422; Aluminum Castings Co. v. Routzahn, 282 U.S. 92; Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United States, 286 U.S. 290; Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 22 B.T.A. 507; aff'd., 62 Fed. (2d) 505; Columbian [357]*357Carbon Co., 25 B.T.A. 456; Permanent Homes Land Co., 27 B.T.A. 142; Russell-Miller Milling Co., supra.

The respondent therefore correctly denied as a deduction in the year 1929 the amount of the capital stock tax which accrued in 1925. The parties have stipulated that the Bakeries Service Corporation is entitled to a deduction in the amount of $43,439.84 from its 1929 income for depreciation on certain letters patent, and an allowance will 'be made therefor upon recomputation.

Judgment will be entered wnder Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd, Inc. v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 101 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Continental Baking Corp. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 354 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 B.T.A. 354, 1934 BTA LEXIS 1340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-baking-corp-v-commissioner-bta-1934.