Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy

288 A.2d 872, 118 N.J. Super. 521
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMarch 15, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 288 A.2d 872 (Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 288 A.2d 872, 118 N.J. Super. 521 (N.J. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

118 N.J. Super. 521 (1972)
288 A.2d 872

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 7, 1972.
Decided March 15, 1972.

Mr. Denis J. Corbett, Staff Attorney, Ocean County Legal Services, Inc., argued the cause for appellants Norma Jarossy and Stephen Jarossy.

*522 Mr. Robert S. Fisher, argued the cause for respondent The First National Bank of Toms River.

Mr. Eugene Jume, filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Conti Causeway Ford.

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellants in the light of the circumstances of this case, and conclude the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in Judge Robert H. Doherty, Jr.'s opinion below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sunjet, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
703 S.W.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Rushton v. Shea
423 F. Supp. 468 (D. Delaware, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.2d 872, 118 N.J. Super. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conti-causeway-ford-v-jarossy-njsuperctappdiv-1972.