Conte v. Incorporated Village

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conte v. Incorporated Village

193 A.D.2d 644, 598 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 644 (Conte v. Incorporated Village) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conte v. Incorporated Village, 193 A.D.2d 644, 598 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered April 4, 1991, as granted the motion by the defendant Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiffs’ failure to serve the requisite notice pursuant to Village Law § 6-628 acts as a bar to the claims against the defendant Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson (see, Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 NY2d 917; Buccellato v County of Nassau, 158 AD2d 440). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered April 4, 1991, as granted the motion by the defendant Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiffs’ failure to serve the requisite notice pursuant to Village Law § 6-628 acts as a bar to the claims against the defendant Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson (see, Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 NY2d 917; Buccellato v County of Nassau, 158 AD2d 440). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 644, 598 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conte-v-incorporated-village-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack