Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. v. Talking Picture Epics, Inc.
This text of 236 A.D. 422 (Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. v. Talking Picture Epics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On this motion for summary judgment, plaintiff’s claim is conceded. The defense set up is a contract made between plaintiff and defendant to extend the defendant’s time of payment. The affidavits submitted in opposition to this motion fail to establish this defense. The agreement relied on is void for indefiniteness. There is no provision when, if ever, the indebtedness will be paid. In addition there is no showing that Schoenberg had power to bind either the plaintiff or the creditors.
No triable issue was presented and the motion for summary judgment should have been granted.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 422, 260 N.Y.S. 1, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-film-industries-inc-v-talking-picture-epics-inc-nyappdiv-1932.