Consolidated Dressed Beef Co. v. Philadelphia

91 A. 367, 245 Pa. 268, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 872
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 4, 1914
DocketAppeal, No. 20
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 A. 367 (Consolidated Dressed Beef Co. v. Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Consolidated Dressed Beef Co. v. Philadelphia, 91 A. 367, 245 Pa. 268, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 872 (Pa. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The undisputed facts in this case appear in the charge to the jury, in which the learned trial judge directed them to return a certificate in favor of the defendant. It was clearly entitled to that certificate, and the basis for the same was competent testimony, the admission of which is the subject of the first assignment of error; The second, third, fourth and fifth complain of the disab lowance of certain offers of testimony. If all of it had been admitted, it would not have helped the appellant, which was bound by the plain, self-construing, terms of its written contract with the city. The judgment on the verdict directed in its favor is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntingdon County v. First-Grange National Bank
20 Pa. D. & C.2d 418 (Huntingdon County Court of Common Pleas, 1959)
Central Boca Chica, Inc. v. Treasurer of Puerto Rico
54 P.R. 404 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Central Boca Chica, Inc. v. Tesorero de Puerto Rico
54 P.R. Dec. 424 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Kuhn v. Commonwealth
140 A. 527 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A. 367, 245 Pa. 268, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consolidated-dressed-beef-co-v-philadelphia-pa-1914.