Conroy v. Sperl
209 A.D. 804
Opinions
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that there was no proof of scienter on the part of defendant of vicious propensity of the dog. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, J.; Finch and MeAvoy, JJ., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conroy v. Sperl, 209 A.D. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
209 A.D. 804 (Conroy v. Sperl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People Ex Rel. Knoblauch v. Warden of the Jail of the Fourth District Magistrates' Court
110 N.E. 451 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Kavanagh v. . New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co.
135 N.E. 933 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Buchanan v. Stout
139 A.D. 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Perrotta v. Picciano
186 A.D. 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
196 A.D. 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)