Conradt v. Sixbee

21 Wis. 383
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cole, J.

It is familiar doctrine that motions for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence are received with caution. And when such newly discovered evidence consists, as in this case, of admissions or declarations of a party, there should be a reasonable probability that such evidence would produce a different verdict, before a new trial should be granted. In view of all the facts of this case, we do not think it proba[385]*385ble that a different result would be obtained if another trial should be had. 5 S. & R., 41; 6 Greenl., 479; 6 Pick., 114.

By the Court. — The order of the circuit court is affirmed.

Dixon, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conradt v. Sixbee, 21 Wis. 383 (Wis. 1867).

21 Wis. 383 (Conradt v. Sixbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hedger v. State
128 N.W. 80 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1911)
Anderson v. Sparks
125 N.W. 925 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1910)
Grace v. McArthur
45 N.W. 518 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Newton v. Gardner
24 Wis. 232 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1869)