Connors v. City Council of Augusta

171 S.E.2d 578, 120 Ga. App. 499, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 832
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 2, 1969
Docket44722
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 171 S.E.2d 578 (Connors v. City Council of Augusta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connors v. City Council of Augusta, 171 S.E.2d 578, 120 Ga. App. 499, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 832 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinions

Evans, Judge.

This is a suit for a money judgment against the City of Augusta by the plaintiff, a retired sergeant of the Police Department of the City of Augusta, alleging he was retired with the rank of sergeant in the Augusta Police Department and has not been paid all pension funds to which he is entitled. The defendant admitted in its answer that he is a retired employee but seeks to allege and show that he is not entitled to any increase in funds due to increases in salary to police sergeants, he having been retired as “Social Hygiene Officer,” which position has been abolished, and the plaintiff would not be entitled to pay increases under his pension rights due to escalations. Further, that he has been paid all funds due him. Both parties moved for summary judgment, submitting sworn affidavits and certified copies of the minutes and ordinances of the City of Augusta; and after a hearing, the court denied plaintiff’s application for summary judgment, and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The appeal is from the order granting summary judgment and dismissing the case. Held:

1. The purpose of the motion for summary judgment is to pierce the formal verbiage of the pleadings by showing that there is no genuine issue “as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660; 1967, pp. 226, 238).

2. Thus the burden is upon the movant to establish the lack of a genuine issue and the right to a judgment in his favor as a matter of law, and any doubt as to such issue is resolved against the movant with all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence being given to the opposing party. Holland v. Sanfax Corp., 106 Ga. App. 1 (126 SE2d 442).

[500]*500Submitted September 12, 1969 Decided October 2, 1969 Rehearing denied October 17, 1969. Oliver K. Mixon, James E. Blanchard, Jr., for appellant. Cumming, Nixon, Eve, Waller & Capers, Samuel C. Waller, for appellee.

3. The documents here show unequivocally that Sgt. Connors was retired as a police sergeant of the Police Department of the City of Augusta. Apparently he was assigned to perform the duties of a “Social Hygiene Officer,” whatever those duties may have been, with the Richmond County Health Department, somewhere during his career and possibly at the time of his retirement. The affidavit of the Chief of Police was that he was still under his command even if he was paid from other funds, this still does not show unequivocally that he was not a Sergeant of the Police Department of the City of Augusta. There is nothing in the record to show he ever resigned to become simply the “Social Hygiene Officer.” However, there is nothing in the record to show how his retirement should be computed to determine whether or not he has been properly paid. Since the evidence submitted on summary judgment fails to show that no genuine issue of facts exists, but, in fact, shows issues remain which must be proven, the enumeration of error that the lower court erred in granting summary judgment on motion of the defendant is meritorious.

Judgment reversed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Auto Sales, Inc. v. Hinrichsen
205 S.E.2d 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
KOHLMEYER & COMPANY v. Bowen
203 S.E.2d 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Frey v. Friendly Motors, Inc.
200 S.E.2d 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Bloodworth v. Smith
196 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Mitchell v. Cox
190 S.E.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Metco Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Southeastern Plumbing Supply Co.
184 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
French v. Norman
184 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Grey v. Roboscope International, Ltd., of Georgia, Inc.
178 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Elder v. Smith
174 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Connors v. City Council of Augusta
171 S.E.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E.2d 578, 120 Ga. App. 499, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connors-v-city-council-of-augusta-gactapp-1969.