Connell v. McNett

Michigan Supreme Court

Connell v. McNett

1 Mich. Pr. 15

DecidedApril 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. Pr. 15 (Connell v. McNett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell v. McNett, 1 Mich. Pr. 15 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

The facts as shown by the papers in the case, were as follows:

a — That the writ of error was issued October 1, 1895, returnable November 1, 1895, and was returned and filed October 10,1895.

b — That on December 3,1895, the attorney for the appellee noticed the case for hearing for the January, 1896, term of court, and the same was stricken from the docket, no .brief having been furnished by the appellant.

e That on March 7,1896, the ease was again noticed by the attorney for the appellee for hearing, and placed upon the docket for the ensuing April term of court.

d — That on March 27,1896, this motion was entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts as shown by the papers in the case, were as follows:

a — That the writ of error was issued October 1, 1895, returnable November 1, 1895, and was returned and filed October 10,1895.

b — That on December 3,1895, the attorney for the appellee noticed the case for hearing for the January, 1896, term of court, and the same was stricken from the docket, no .brief having been furnished by the appellant.

e That on March 7,1896, the ease was again noticed by the attorney for the appellee for hearing, and placed upon the docket for the ensuing April term of court.

d — That on March 27,1896, this motion was entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mich. Pr. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-mcnett-mich-1896.