CONN v. City of Reno

Ninth Circuit

CONN v. City of Reno

658 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18487, 2011 WL 4014336

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2011·No. 07-15572·Published·Cited by 118 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2010), except that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Connick v. Thompson, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts 111(C)(1) and 111(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2010), except that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Connick v. Thompson, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts 111(C)(1) and 111(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

CONN v. City of Reno, 658 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18487, 2011 WL 4014336 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

658 F.3d 897 (CONN v. City of Reno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related