CONN v. City of Reno

658 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18487, 2011 WL 4014336
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 6, 2011
Docket07-15572
StatusPublished
Cited by118 cases

This text of 658 F.3d 897 (CONN v. City of Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CONN v. City of Reno, 658 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18487, 2011 WL 4014336 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2010), except that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Connick v. Thompson, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts 111(C)(1) and 111(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18487, 2011 WL 4014336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conn-v-city-of-reno-ca9-2011.