Snook v. Johnson

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 28, 2025·No. 3:23-cv-00338·Unknown

Opinion

kee TROY ALLON SNOOK, Case No. 3:23-CV-00338-MMD-CLB Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CALVIN JOHNSON, et Defendants. On May 2, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 41). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Accordingly, the Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Friday, June 27, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time will be granted, absent extraordinary circumstances. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the Court for decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. . DATED: May 28, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snook v. Johnson, (D. Nev. 2025).

Snook v. Johnson (Snook v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related