Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A.

622 So. 2d 559, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7981, 1993 WL 288723
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1993·No. No. 92-2317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

During pendency of an appeal questioning the validity of a final order dismissing an amended complaint (with no reservation of jurisdiction to entertain a motion for attorneys’ fees)1 the trial court awarded attorneys’ fees pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes. The appeal of the final order of dismissal resulted in a five page opinion of this court. See Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), which affirmed the dismissal. The instant appeal involves the validity of the attorneys' fees award. We reverse.

First, because without a reservation of jurisdiction the trial court was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion for attorneys’ fees, see and compare Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So.2d 519 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Patin v. Popino, 459 So.2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), and second, the motion lacked merit as it is apparent from this court’s opinion that the plaintiff’s amended complaint was not frivolous. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Go., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); Neuromed, Inc. v. Florida Energy Management Services, Inc., 600 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

The order under review is reversed with directions to vacate the order awarding attorneys’ fees.

Reversed with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 622 So. 2d 559, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7981, 1993 WL 288723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 559 (Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McHugh v. McHugh
819 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)