Conkling v. Krandusky

123 N.Y.S. 1112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conkling v. Krandusky. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 A.D. 761

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See opinion by Spring, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 127 App. Div. 761, 112 N. Y. Supp. 13.

McLennan, P. j., and KRUSE, J., dissent, on the grounds stated in the opinion by MCLENNAN, P. J., on the former appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conkling v. Krandusky, 123 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

123 N.Y.S. 1112 (Conkling v. Krandusky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conkling v. Krandusky
127 A.D. 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)