Conkling v. Krandusky

123 N.Y.S. 1112

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 1112 (Conkling v. Krandusky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conkling v. Krandusky, 123 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See opinion by Spring, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 127 App. Div. 761, 112 N. Y. Supp. 13.

McLennan, P. j., and KRUSE, J., dissent, on the grounds stated in the opinion by MCLENNAN, P. J., on the former appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conkling v. Krandusky
127 A.D. 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conkling-v-krandusky-nyappdiv-1910.