Cone v. Randolph County Schools

Fourth Circuit

Cone v. Randolph County Schools

103 F. App'x 731

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 16, 2004·No. No. 04-1319·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elliott Cone and Nancy Cone appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Randolph County Schools on their action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-87 (2000), and its North Carolina counterpart, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-106 (1999), brought on behalf of their child E. H. Cone, III. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cone v. Randolph County Sck, 302 F.Supp.2d 500 (M.D.N.C.2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Elliott Cone and Nancy Cone appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Randolph County Schools on their action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-87 (2000), and its North Carolina counterpart, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-106 (1999), brought on behalf of their child E. H. Cone, III. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cone v. Randolph County Sck, 302 F.Supp.2d 500 (M.D.N.C.2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cone v. Randolph County Schools, 103 F. App'x 731 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

103 F. App'x 731 (Cone v. Randolph County Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related