Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County

993 F.2d 784, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,643, 74 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 50, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14986
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 7, 1993·No. No. 91-4194·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on plaintiffs-appellants’ suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en bane. The previous panel’s opinion 983 F.2d 197, is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 993 F.2d 784, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,643, 74 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 50, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14986 (11th Cir. 1993).

993 F.2d 784 (Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County
157 F.R.D. 533 (M.D. Florida, 1994)
The Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County
993 F.2d 784 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)