Condosta v. Condosta

365 A.2d 537, 134 Vt. 609, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Condosta v. Condosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Vt. 35
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 9, 1976·No. No. 286-75·Published

Opinion

The motion of the plaintiff that she not be required to respond or object to the appellant’s proposed “Statement of the Proceedings When no Report was Made” and that it not be included in the record of the appeal in this case is granted. V.R.A.P. 10(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Condosta v. Condosta, 365 A.2d 537, 134 Vt. 609, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 756 (Vt. 1976).

365 A.2d 537 (Condosta v. Condosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.