Condosta v. Condosta

365 A.2d 537, 134 Vt. 609, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 756
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedFebruary 9, 1976
DocketNo. 286-75
StatusPublished

This text of 365 A.2d 537 (Condosta v. Condosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Condosta v. Condosta, 365 A.2d 537, 134 Vt. 609, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 756 (Vt. 1976).

Opinion

The motion of the plaintiff that she not be required to respond or object to the appellant’s proposed “Statement of the Proceedings When no Report was Made” and that it not be included in the record of the appeal in this case is granted. V.R.A.P. 10(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 A.2d 537, 134 Vt. 609, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condosta-v-condosta-vt-1976.