Condon v. Arata
96 N.E.2d 890, 302 N.Y. 579
This text of 96 N.E.2d 890 (Condon v. Arata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Condon v. Arata, 96 N.E.2d 890, 302 N.Y. 579 (N.Y. 1951).
Opinion
Ida Condon, Respondent,
v.
Mae Arata et al., Defendants, and Dorothy I. Post, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
William L. Shumate and Chester E. Barrett for appellant.
A. L. Sainer, Milton E. Haft and Harry B. Frank for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Little v. City of Albany
169 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Moore v. Suburban Fuel Oil Service, Inc.
22 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Basil v. City of New York
9 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Weiser v. City of New York
5 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Allen v. Weiss
279 A.D. 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 890, 302 N.Y. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/condon-v-arata-ny-1951.