Condon v. Arata
96 N.E.2d 890, 302 N.Y. 579
Opinion
Ida Condon, Respondent,
v.
Mae Arata et al., Defendants, and Dorothy I. Post, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
William L. Shumate and Chester E. Barrett for appellant.
A. L. Sainer, Milton E. Haft and Harry B. Frank for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Condon v. Arata, 96 N.E.2d 890, 302 N.Y. 579 (N.Y. 1951).
96 N.E.2d 890 (Condon v. Arata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Little v. City of Albany
169 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Moore v. Suburban Fuel Oil Service, Inc.
22 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Basil v. City of New York
9 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Weiser v. City of New York
5 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Allen v. Weiss
279 A.D. 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)