Concrete Block & Products Co. v. Kurtz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Concrete Block & Products Co. v. Kurtz

190 N.W.2d 725, 34 Mich. App. 38, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1551

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 24, 1971

DocketDocket 6426

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.W.2d 725 (Concrete Block & Products Co. v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concrete Block & Products Co. v. Kurtz, 190 N.W.2d 725, 34 Mich. App. 38, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1551 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal as of right from a judgment against defendant, Walter Kurtz, in the amount of $81,116.37 for conversion and misappropriation of the corporate funds of plaintiff Concrete Block & Products Company.

As required by GCR 1963, 517, the trial court sitting without a jury made specific findings of fact regarding the amount of the judgment. Findings of fact by a trial judge in a nonjury action will not he reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. GCR 1963, 517; McDaniels v. Schroeder (1968), 9 Mich App 444; King v. Partridge (1968), 9 Mich App 540; Lidke v. Jackson Vibrators, Inc. (1967), 379 Mich 294. The record supports the court’s rulings and this Court will not reverse them.

The defense theory at trial was that there had been a conspiracy between defendant’s wife and the family attorney, which he wished to prove by recorded telephone conversations. The trial court would not allow the tapes into evidence as four of the sis tapes had been edited. The admission of fewer than all the tapes would have resulted in obvious prejudice. Defendant assigns this as reversible error. He does not show in what respect this alleged conspiracy could alter the amount of the debt owed to Concrete Block. The admission of the tapes was not an essential element of proof since all claims of plaintiff were substantiated by voluminous business records. The attorney’s claim of the attorney-client privilege was also properly upheld by *40 the trial court as the record does not support defendant’s claim that the privilege was ever waived.

As there are no convincing circumstances disclosing that crucial proof has been overlooked or ignored and the findings of fact are supported by the record, this case is affirmed. Northwest Auto Company v. Mulligan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (1957), 348 Mich 279; Schneider v. Pomerville (1957), 348 Mich 49; Barnes v. Beck (1957), 348 Mich 286.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal as of right from a judgment against defendant, Walter Kurtz, in the amount of $81,116.37 for conversion and misappropriation of the corporate funds of plaintiff Concrete Block & Products Company.

As required by GCR 1963, 517, the trial court sitting without a jury made specific findings of fact regarding the amount of the judgment. Findings of fact by a trial judge in a nonjury action will not he reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. GCR 1963, 517; McDaniels v. Schroeder (1968), 9 Mich App 444; King v. Partridge (1968), 9 Mich App 540; Lidke v. Jackson Vibrators, Inc. (1967), 379 Mich 294. The record supports the court’s rulings and this Court will not reverse them.

The defense theory at trial was that there had been a conspiracy between defendant’s wife and the family attorney, which he wished to prove by recorded telephone conversations. The trial court would not allow the tapes into evidence as four of the sis tapes had been edited. The admission of fewer than all the tapes would have resulted in obvious prejudice. Defendant assigns this as reversible error. He does not show in what respect this alleged conspiracy could alter the amount of the debt owed to Concrete Block. The admission of the tapes was not an essential element of proof since all claims of plaintiff were substantiated by voluminous business records. The attorney’s claim of the attorney-client privilege was also properly upheld by *40 the trial court as the record does not support defendant’s claim that the privilege was ever waived.

As there are no convincing circumstances disclosing that crucial proof has been overlooked or ignored and the findings of fact are supported by the record, this case is affirmed. Northwest Auto Company v. Mulligan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (1957), 348 Mich 279; Schneider v. Pomerville (1957), 348 Mich 49; Barnes v. Beck (1957), 348 Mich 286.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.W.2d 725, 34 Mich. App. 38, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concrete-block-products-co-v-kurtz-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack