Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB
This text of Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB (Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-60404
CONCORDIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Petitioner-Cross- Respondent,
versus
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross- Petitioner.
Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order ofthe National Labor Relations Board (15-CA-13053-2)
June 26, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We are not persuaded that Concordia Electric Cooperative, Inc.
is exempt from the National Labor Relations Act as a "political
subdivision" of the State of Louisiana. 29 U.S.C. § 152(2); NLRB
v. Natural Gas Utility Dist. of Hawkins County, Tenn., 402 U.S. 600
(1971). We have previously rejected the claim advanced by
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. Concordia that a public utility whose directors are elected by its
members is responsible to the general electorate. See NLRB v.
Natchez Trace Elec. Power Ass'n, 476 F.2d 1042, 1045 (5th Cir.
1973); see also Fayette Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 316 N.L.R.B.
1118 (1995).
In addition, the other Hawkins factors point against
Concordia's claimed exemption. Among other things, Concordia, like
privately owned utility companies, is subject to regulation by
Louisiana's Public Service Commission. See Cajun Elec. Power
Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, 544 So.2d
362, 365 (La.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 991 (1989). It is exempt
from Louisiana's Open Meetings law, which applies to public bodies,
Hunerjager v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp., 434 So.2d 590, 591-92
(La. Ct. App.), cert. denied, 440 So.2d 149 (La. 1983), and its
power of eminent domain is coextensive with that possessed by
privately owned electrical utilities. See La. Rev. Stat. Ann.
§ 12:403(12). In short, these factors indicate that Louisiana
treats electrical cooperatives like investor-owned public
utilities, not as a political subdivision of the state.
ENFORCEMENT GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concordia-elec-coop-v-nlrb-ca5-1996.