Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 1996
Docket95-60404
StatusUnpublished

This text of Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB (Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB, (5th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60404

CONCORDIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Petitioner-Cross- Respondent,

versus

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross- Petitioner.

Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order ofthe National Labor Relations Board (15-CA-13053-2)

June 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We are not persuaded that Concordia Electric Cooperative, Inc.

is exempt from the National Labor Relations Act as a "political

subdivision" of the State of Louisiana. 29 U.S.C. § 152(2); NLRB

v. Natural Gas Utility Dist. of Hawkins County, Tenn., 402 U.S. 600

(1971). We have previously rejected the claim advanced by

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. Concordia that a public utility whose directors are elected by its

members is responsible to the general electorate. See NLRB v.

Natchez Trace Elec. Power Ass'n, 476 F.2d 1042, 1045 (5th Cir.

1973); see also Fayette Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 316 N.L.R.B.

1118 (1995).

In addition, the other Hawkins factors point against

Concordia's claimed exemption. Among other things, Concordia, like

privately owned utility companies, is subject to regulation by

Louisiana's Public Service Commission. See Cajun Elec. Power

Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n, 544 So.2d

362, 365 (La.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 991 (1989). It is exempt

from Louisiana's Open Meetings law, which applies to public bodies,

Hunerjager v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp., 434 So.2d 590, 591-92

(La. Ct. App.), cert. denied, 440 So.2d 149 (La. 1983), and its

power of eminent domain is coextensive with that possessed by

privately owned electrical utilities. See La. Rev. Stat. Ann.

§ 12:403(12). In short, these factors indicate that Louisiana

treats electrical cooperatives like investor-owned public

utilities, not as a political subdivision of the state.

ENFORCEMENT GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Public Serv. Com'n
544 So. 2d 362 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)
Hunerjager v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp.
434 So. 2d 590 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Concordia Elec Coop v. NLRB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concordia-elec-coop-v-nlrb-ca5-1996.