Concord Watch. Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 900, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1816
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 19, 1967
DocketNo. P67/202; protests 66/27148, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 900 (Concord Watch. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Concord Watch. Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 900, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1816 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Olivee, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements that were manufactured and repaired or corrected in substantially the same manner as and are similar in all material respects concerning adjustment to the watch movements which were the subject of Benrus Watch Company et al v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), and therein held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benrus Watch Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 28 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 900, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.