Concord Watch Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Concord Watch Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 822

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 26, 1966

DocketNo. P66/297; No. P66/298; No. P66/299; No. P66/300; No. P66/301; No. P66/302; No. P66/303

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 822 (Concord Watch Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concord Watch Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 822 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of Benrus Watch Company et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), wherein said watch movements were held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of Benrus Watch Company et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), wherein said watch movements were held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack