Concord Corp. v. Superior Court
This text of 148 N.E.2d 178 (Concord Corp. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory decree sustaining demurrer affirmed. Orders denying motions to amend affirmed. Final decree affirmed. This is a bill in equity to which a single justice sustained a demurrer for want of equity. A motion to amend the bill in equity was denied, and a second motion to amend into a petition for writ of mandamus was denied. A final decree was entered dismissing the bill. The plaintiff appealed from all these rulings. There was no error. The bill was an attempt to appeal in an improper manner from rulings in the Superior Court in a case there pending. It was also an effort to attack the rescript of this court in State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc. v. MacNeil Bros. Co. 334 Mass. 294. The denial of the motions to amend was discretionary, and an examination of the proposed amendments demonstrates that they could not rightly have been allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 N.E.2d 178, 337 Mass. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-corp-v-superior-court-mass-1958.