Con-Fab, Inc. v. Duke
696 So. 2d 1070, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 580, 1996 WL 432355
Opinions
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App. P.; Ex parte Eastwood Foods, Inc., 575 So.2d 91 (Ala.1991); and James River Corp. v. Mays, 572 So.2d 469, 474 (Ala.Civ.App.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Con-Fab, Inc. v. Duke, 696 So. 2d 1070, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 580, 1996 WL 432355 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).
696 So. 2d 1070 (Con-Fab, Inc. v. Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
INTERNATIONAL REHAB. ASSOCIATES v. Adams
613 So. 2d 1207 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1992)
Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. Walley
541 So. 2d 560 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
James River Corp. v. Mays
572 So. 2d 469 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Golden
486 So. 2d 435 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.
575 So. 2d 91 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)