Compton v. Jarvis

Fourth Circuit

Compton v. Jarvis

49 F. App'x 413

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 2002

Docket02-7152

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 F. App'x 413 (Compton v. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Compton v. Jarvis, 49 F. App'x 413 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sammy W. Compton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Compton v. Jarvis, No. CA-02-751-7 (W.D.Va. July 22, 2002). We deny a certificate of appeal-ability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). *414 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sammy W. Compton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Compton v. Jarvis, No. CA-02-751-7 (W.D.Va. July 22, 2002). We deny a certificate of appeal-ability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). *414 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 F. App'x 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compton-v-jarvis-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack