Compo Machinery Corp. v. Pants Ltd. S.A.

417 S.E.2d 443, 203 Ga. App. 728, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 102, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 609
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 20, 1992
DocketA91A2025
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 417 S.E.2d 443 (Compo Machinery Corp. v. Pants Ltd. S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compo Machinery Corp. v. Pants Ltd. S.A., 417 S.E.2d 443, 203 Ga. App. 728, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 102, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

Johnson, Judge.

Compo Machinery Corporation (Compo) brought a breach of contract action against Pants Limited S.A. (Pants) in Barrow County, Georgia. Compo is a Massachusetts corporation and Pants is a Haitian corportion. Pants alleges that the contract giving rise to this action was not negotiated, entered into or executed in Georgia. Pants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and, after a hearing, the trial court granted the motion. Compo appeals from that ruling. No transcript of the hearing is included as part of the record on appeal.

“The party asserting error on appeal has the burden to show it affirmatively by the record. [Cit.] . . . ‘This court is a court for the correction of errors and its decision must be made on the record sent to this court by the clerk of the court below and not upon the briefs of counsel.’ [Cit.] . . . The party asserting error has a duty to show it by the record. [Cit.]” McClaskey v. Jiffy Lube, 197 Ga. App. 537, 538 (398 SE2d 825) (1990).

We have thoroughly reviewed the entire record on appeal and absent a transcript of the hearing it is unclear what evidence the trial court relied upon in making its decision. Accordingly, Compo has [729]*729failed to show any error by the record and without “a transcript it must be presumed that the trial judge correctly ruled on the issues presented.” Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Jackson, 199 Ga. App. 627 (405 SE2d 518) (1991).

Decided March 20, 1992 Reconsideration denied April 2, 1992. James A. Dunlap, Jr., for appellant. Scott & Quarterman, Donald T. Wells, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Carley, P. J., concurs, and Beasley, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Knebel
474 S.E.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 S.E.2d 443, 203 Ga. App. 728, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 102, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compo-machinery-corp-v-pants-ltd-sa-gactapp-1992.