Compania De Navigacion Porto Ronco, S. A. v. S/S American Oriole

474 F. Supp. 22, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13813
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedAugust 2, 1976
DocketCiv. A. 75-257
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 474 F. Supp. 22 (Compania De Navigacion Porto Ronco, S. A. v. S/S American Oriole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compania De Navigacion Porto Ronco, S. A. v. S/S American Oriole, 474 F. Supp. 22, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13813 (E.D. La. 1976).

Opinion

MITCHELL, District Judge.

This matter came on for trial on a former date on the issue of liability vel non before the Court sitting without a jury.

Suit was brought by Compañía de Navigacion Porto Ronco, S.A.' as owner of the S/S Locarno against the S/S American Oriole, in rem ; her owner, American Foreign Steamship Corporation, in personam ; and co-defendant Todd Shipyard Corporation, in personam for damages resulting from the striking of the moored Locarno by the free drifting American Oriole, after that vessel had broken adrift from Todd’s wharf on January 10,1975. Intervenors, C. H. Sorensen and Sonner, as owner of the anchored M/S Aino; A/S Uglands Rederi, as owner of the M/S Danita; Golden Chalice Steamship, Inc., as owner of the anchored M/S. Golden Chalice; and Amstar Corporation, as wharf owner, at whose dock the Locarno was moored, also claimed against the American Oriole and Todd for damages resulting from the free drifting American Oriole striking the anchored vessels and the Amstar Wharf. American Foreign Steamship Corporation cross-claimed against co-defendant Todd for damages to its own vessel as well as for any amounts which it might be adjudged to be owing the others.

After hearing the testimony and considering the depositions and exhibits received in evidence, the Court, in oral findings, concluded that defendant Todd Shipyard Corporation was solely at fault. The Court now enters the following formal findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52(a) F.R.C.P., in support of that decision.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I.

The American Oriole, owned and operated by defendant, American Foreign Steamship Corporation, is a dry cargo ship of U.S. registry, 492 feet in length, and 69.5 feet in beam. In her lightened state, the vessel’s draft is 6 feet 1 inch at the bow and 16 feet 11 inches at the stern. By arrangement with Todd Shipyard Corporation, the American Oriole berthed at Todd’s facility in New Orleans to undergo repairs and other work. Thereafter, the vessel was to lay-up as a dead ship for an indeterminate period. The American Oriole had recently returned from a lengthy foreign voyage and her owner was to await a further charter party for cargo.

*24 II.

The American Oriole arrived November 27, 1974, and was directed by Todd to its Lower Navy Berth No. 4. Her crew and officers were paid off and her log ended on that day. Thereafter, the American Oriole’s main propulsion, auxiliaries and generators were shut down and secured and the vessel was placed in Todd’s drydock.

III.

On December 4, 1974, the American Oriole, without power and unmanned except for her master, Captain Carl Enstrom, was taken out of dry dock by tugs, with the assistance of Todd’s docking master and a river pilot, and was secured at Todd’s Lower Navy Berth No. 4. Captain Enstrom remained aboard during the tie-up; he went fore and aft in consultation with Todd’s docking master and was satisfied with the arrangement and alignment of the lines. In view of the indefinite stay of the dead ship, in the oncoming winter months, Captain Enstrom suggested to the Todd docking master that additional lines be put out in the future. He considered the existing mooring lines sufficient for temporary mooring but not for a long lay-up. The docking master testified that two additional lines, fore and aft, were then put out.

IV.

Repairs by Todd were continued while the vessel was in the lay-up berth. For owner’s account, Vinson Guard Service was engaged for an around-the-clock security guard as gangway watchman, to prevent trespassing and theft. During this lay-up period Todd provided and charged for electricity, line handlers to adjust and put out mooring lines as necessary, and daily fire watch service whose duties included checking all mooring lines. Before returning to New York on December 11, the owners’ port engineer, Raymond Butler, instructed the gangway watchman that if there was any difficulty, he should go to the red-painted emergency telephone near the gangway and call Todd authorities for assistance. As the port engineer departed, he made a slight adjustment in the mooring lines by taking up slack at the stern; Todd’s ship superintendent and another workman assisted him in doing this.

V.

Todd Shipyard’s Lower Navy Berth No. 4 is at the extreme down-river end of the Todd properties. The American Oriole was moored port side to, near the downriver end of the wharf. Forward of her bow were two open berths; upriver, the M/S Galaxias was moored port side to, in lay-up status, with a skeleton crew aboard. At the stern of, and below the Galaxias running downriver along the open berths, was a section of several hundred feet of damaged wharf and planking, roped off by a guard rail. The damaged area, enclosed by the guard rail, lay several hundred feet upriver of the American Oriole’s bow.

VI.

The testimony adduced shows that the bow lines of the American Oriole, consisting of five separate leads, led forward some 40 feet to double bitts. Thereafter, along the offshore side of the wooden wharf, interspersed every 48 feet, were a series of cleats and double bitts, the last of which was approximately 79 feet from the down river end of the wharf. Forward and after spring lines of the American Oriole led to cleats and double bitts in the normal manner. The vessel’s stern lines led across the wharf to bollards, at a near right angle, and a forward lead led to another set of bollards on the inshore side of the wharf.

VII.

The American Oriole was berthed at Lower Navy Berth No. 4 on January 10, 1975. That morning the U. S. Department of Commerce, National Weather Service Forecast Office, New Orleans, Louisiana, issued “Severe Weather Statement(s)” pertaining to a tornado watch in a widespread area in south Louisiana, specifically including Orleans Parish where the Todd yard is located and predicting a line of thunder *25 storms accompanied by heavy rain, possible hail and gusty winds. These severe weather statements were issued at 7:30 A.M., 8:45 A.M., 9:45 A.M., and 10:45 A.M., January 10, 1975. The 9:45 A.M. and 10:45 A.M. statements included the following:

“Some of the thunderstorms will be accompanied by wind gusts to near 70 M.P.H. and a possible tornado.”

VIII.

Todd’s management was aware of the severe weather prediction in the early morning of January 10. Todd’s general superintendent instructed the foreman of its labor department to check the American Oriole and put out any additional lines deemed necessary. The foreman passed the order on to the labor leaderman. However, the leaderman thought that he was checking mooring lines because of changes in the height of the river, and was unaware of the severe weather forecast.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galaxy Lights Ltd. v. Priestley
D. Rhode Island, 2022
In re the Complaint of Atlantic Marine, Property Holding Co.
570 F. Supp. 2d 1369 (S.D. Alabama, 2008)
In Re Matter of Complaint of Atlantic Marine Prop.
570 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (S.D. Alabama, 2008)
AMERICAN RIVER TRANS. v. Paragon Marine Services
213 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (E.D. Missouri, 2002)
Skandia Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Star Shipping As
173 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (S.D. Alabama, 2001)
Jongsuk Kim v. United States
887 F. Supp. 701 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.
715 F. Supp. 738 (E.D. Louisiana, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. Supp. 22, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compania-de-navigacion-porto-ronco-s-a-v-ss-american-oriole-laed-1976.