Commonwealth v. Young, M.

145 A.3d 1155, 636 Pa. 573, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1978, 2016 WL 4625248
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 6, 2016
Docket551 EAL 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 A.3d 1155 (Commonwealth v. Young, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Young, M., 145 A.3d 1155, 636 Pa. 573, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1978, 2016 WL 4625248 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the mandatory sentence imposed by the trial court was illegal pursuant to Alleyne ?

The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Wolfe, 636 Pa. 37, 140 A.3d 651 (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Young, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 A.3d 1155, 636 Pa. 573, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1978, 2016 WL 4625248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-young-m-pa-2016.