Commonwealth v. Wright

113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 11, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 A.2d 724 (Commonwealth v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Wright, 113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476 (Pa. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

178 Pa. Superior Ct. 181 (1955)

Commonwealth
v.
Wright, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 1, 1955.
May 11, 1955.

Before RHODES, P.J., ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE and ERVIN, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).

*182 Paul C. VanDyke, with him Cochrane & VanDyke, for appellant.

Ernest L. Green, Assistant District Attorney, with him Joseph E. Pappano, First Assistant District Attorney, and Raymond R. Start, District Attorney, for appellee.

PER CURIAM, May 11, 1955:

The six judges who heard the argument of this case being equally divided in opinion, the order of the court below granting a new trial is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Coyle
154 A.2d 412 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Commonwealth v. Hunscik
128 A.2d 169 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wright-pasuperct-1955.