Commonwealth v. Wright
This text of 113 A.2d 724 (Commonwealth v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Commonwealth
v.
Wright, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Before RHODES, P.J., ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE and ERVIN, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).
*182 Paul C. VanDyke, with him Cochrane & VanDyke, for appellant.
Ernest L. Green, Assistant District Attorney, with him Joseph E. Pappano, First Assistant District Attorney, and Raymond R. Start, District Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM, May 11, 1955:
The six judges who heard the argument of this case being equally divided in opinion, the order of the court below granting a new trial is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wright-pasuperct-1955.