Commonwealth v. Wright
113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476
Opinion
Commonwealth
v.
Wright, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Before RHODES, P.J., ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE and ERVIN, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent).
*182 Paul C. VanDyke, with him Cochrane & VanDyke, for appellant.
Ernest L. Green, Assistant District Attorney, with him Joseph E. Pappano, First Assistant District Attorney, and Raymond R. Start, District Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM, May 11, 1955:
The six judges who heard the argument of this case being equally divided in opinion, the order of the court below granting a new trial is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Wright, 113 A.2d 724, 178 Pa. Super. 181, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 476 (Pa. Ct. App. 1955).
113 A.2d 724 (Commonwealth v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Coyle
154 A.2d 412 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Commonwealth v. Hunscik
128 A.2d 169 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)