Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Williams

47 A.3d 1173, 616 Pa. 353

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 18, 2012·No. No. 601 MAL 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether a Defendant has a right to present informed expert testimony to rebut the Commonwealth’s evidence in support of its motion pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5985 to allow a child witness to testify in a room separate from courtroom proceedings?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether a Defendant has a right to present informed expert testimony to rebut the Commonwealth’s evidence in support of its motion pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5985 to allow a child witness to testify in a room separate from courtroom proceedings?

Commonwealth v. Williams, 47 A.3d 1173, 616 Pa. 353 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

47 A.3d 1173 (Commonwealth v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related