Commonwealth v. Williams

979 A.2d 838, 602 Pa. 194, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1663
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 597 Pa. 109
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 17, 2009·No. 759 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Whether the trial court’s decision to allow the deliberating jury to listen to playback of audio-recorded trial testimony outside the defendant’s presence violated Pa. R.Crim.P. 602.
2. Whether the trial court’s decision to allow the jury to listen to playback of audio-recorded trial testimony in the deliberation room violated Pa.R.Crim.P. 646.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Williams, 979 A.2d 838, 602 Pa. 194, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1663 (Pa. 2009).

979 A.2d 838 (Commonwealth v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.