Commonwealth v. Williams
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On September 25, 1972, appellant, Ronald Lee Williams, was convicted by a jury in Lehigh County of being an accessory before and after the fact to forging stolen money orders and an accessory before the fact to counterfeiting an American Express Traveler’s check. Following a denial of post-verdict motions, a prison sentence was imposed. Williams’ direct appeal to the Superior Court resulted in an affirmance of the judgment without opinion, Commonwealth v. Williams, 231 Pa.Super. 804, 331 A.2d 526 (1975).
Later in 1975, Williams filed a petition in the trial court seeking post conviction relief, Act of January 25, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1580 §§ 1 et seq., 19 P.S. §§ 1180-1 et seq. After a [374]*374counseled evidentiary hearing, the petition was dismissed. On appeal the Superior Court affirmed without opinion. We granted allocatur and reinstated Williams’ bail pending disposition of the appeal. We now affirm the order of the Superior Court for this reason.
Williams contends he is entitled to a new trial because his self-retained trial counsel failed to provide “competent representation.”
Order affirmed. The order of May 27, 1976, reinstating bail is vacated.
This is the only reason asserted in support of the request for post conviction relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
388 A.2d 702 (Commonwealth v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.