Commonwealth v. Williams

373 A.2d 1087, 473 Pa. 140, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 698
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 3, 1977·No. Nos. 184 and 557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of voluntary manslaughter and simple assault. The conviction arose out of the shooting death of one individual and the wounding of another. In this appeal, appellant asserts the trial court erred in (1) refusing to charge the jury on involuntary manslaughter; (2) refusing to grant a mistrial after allegedly improper prosecutorial remarks made during closing argument; and (8) prohibiting the defense from introducing certain evidence at trial. Appellant failed to preserve these claims for appellate review, however, as he did not raise them in written post-verdict motions. See Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 331 A.2d 213 (1975). Therefore, judgment of sentence must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Williams, 373 A.2d 1087, 473 Pa. 140, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 698 (Pa. 1977).

373 A.2d 1087 (Commonwealth v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Kesting
417 A.2d 1262 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)