Commonwealth v. White
This text of 249 A.2d 349 (Commonwealth v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion
Order affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Opinion by
in Support oe Affirmance :
Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A. 2d 201 (1968), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. ed. 2d 493 (1967), are not authority for the position taken by Justice O’Brien. In both of these cases the issue came before the court upon direct appeal. Since the instant appeal relates to a post-conviction hearing, it is my opinion that we are not bound by the determination in Baker and Anders.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-white-pa-1969.