Commonwealth v. White

249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 15, 1969
DocketAppeal, 443
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 249 A.2d 349 (Commonwealth v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. White, 249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531 (Pa. 1969).

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen

in Support oe Affirmance :

Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A. 2d 201 (1968), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. ed. 2d 493 (1967), are not authority for the position taken by Justice O’Brien. In both of these cases the issue came before the court upon direct appeal. Since the instant appeal relates to a post-conviction hearing, it is my opinion that we are not bound by the determination in Baker and Anders.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell and Mr. Justice Jones join in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Bartol
279 A.2d 771 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Covington
276 A.2d 312 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Sparks
263 A.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. White
249 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-white-pa-1969.