Commonwealth v. White

249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 15, 1969·No. Appeal, 443·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen

in Support oe Affirmance :

Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A. 2d 201 (1968), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. ed. 2d 493 (1967), are not authority for the position taken by Justice O’Brien. In both of these cases the issue came before the court upon direct appeal. Since the instant appeal relates to a post-conviction hearing, it is my opinion that we are not bound by the determination in Baker and Anders.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell and Mr. Justice Jones join in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. White, 249 A.2d 349, 433 Pa. 109, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 531 (Pa. 1969).

249 A.2d 349 (Commonwealth v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Bartol
279 A.2d 771 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Covington
276 A.2d 312 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Sparks
263 A.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. White
249 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)