Commonwealth v. White

38 N.E. 707, 162 Mass. 403, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 89
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 N.E. 707 (Commonwealth v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. White, 38 N.E. 707, 162 Mass. 403, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 89 (Mass. 1894).

Opinion

Allen, J.

We cannot see that the two letters had any legitimate tendency to prove a criminal intent on the part of the defendant in the acts which were the subject of the indictment. They were written more than six months before, and related to other persons, and do not show any purpose to collect black-mail of dealers in milk. Since an objection was expressly taken to the admission of this evidence, and since it was admitted as having some tendency to show a criminal intent, and since we are unable to see that it had any such tendency, we feel constrained to grant a new trial, although the other evidence may have been sufficient to warrant the conviction. Commonwealth v. Bosworth, 22 Pick. 397, 400. Commonwealth v. Keenan, 152 Mass. 9. Maguire v. Middlesex Railroad, 115 Mass. 239.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Harris
295 N.E.2d 687 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 N.E. 707, 162 Mass. 403, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-white-mass-1894.