Commonwealth v. Wentz
This text of 435 A.2d 176 (Commonwealth v. Wentz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Gerald R. WENTZ, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Wilbert H. Beachy, III, Public Defender, Somerset, for appellant.
*617 Alan Ellis, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae, Amicus Curiae Committee, Nat. Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc. (NACDL).
Leonard N. Sosnov, Philadelphia, amicus curiae.
James B. Yelovich, Dist. Atty., Somerset, for appellee.
Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The Appeal, 421 A.2d 796, is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 A.2d 176, 495 Pa. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wentz-pa-1981.