Commonwealth v. Walsh

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Commonwealth v. Walsh

687 N.E.2d 1256, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 924, 1997 Mass. App. LEXIS 223

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1997

DocketNo. 96-P-1346

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 687 N.E.2d 1256 (Commonwealth v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Walsh, 687 N.E.2d 1256, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 924, 1997 Mass. App. LEXIS 223 (Mass. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was tried in a District Court for leaving the scene of a personal injury accident (G. L. c. 90, § 24[2]); the judge found “sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt,” imposed a small victim-witness fee, and continued the case for ninety days, at the end of which the case was dismissed. The defendant appeals from the finding of sufficient facts.

The appeal must be dismissed. The finding of sufficient facts is not an appealable order. In a criminal case the judgment is the sentence. Commonwealth v. Dascalakis, 246 Mass. 12, 19 (1923). Commonwealth v. Locke, 338 Mass. 682, 684 (1959). Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(b), 378 Mass. 929 (1979), allows an appeal to be filed “within thirty days after the verdict or finding of guilt or within thirty days after imposition of sentence”; but the purpose of the first phrase, as the Reporters’ Notes to Mass.R.A.P. (4)(b), Mass. Ann. Laws, Rules of Appellate Procedure at 40 (Law. Co-op. 1979), explain, is to avoid invalidating, as premature, appeals filed between verdict or finding and sentencing. The subsequent order of dismissal is a final, appeal-able order, but it is not the order appealed from, nor is the defendant aggrieved thereby.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was tried in a District Court for leaving the scene of a personal injury accident (G. L. c. 90, § 24[2]); the judge found “sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt,” imposed a small victim-witness fee, and continued the case for ninety days, at the end of which the case was dismissed. The defendant appeals from the finding of sufficient facts.

The appeal must be dismissed. The finding of sufficient facts is not an appealable order. In a criminal case the judgment is the sentence. Commonwealth v. Dascalakis, 246 Mass. 12, 19 (1923). Commonwealth v. Locke, 338 Mass. 682, 684 (1959). Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(b), 378 Mass. 929 (1979), allows an appeal to be filed “within thirty days after the verdict or finding of guilt or within thirty days after imposition of sentence”; but the purpose of the first phrase, as the Reporters’ Notes to Mass.R.A.P. (4)(b), Mass. Ann. Laws, Rules of Appellate Procedure at 40 (Law. Co-op. 1979), explain, is to avoid invalidating, as premature, appeals filed between verdict or finding and sentencing. The subsequent order of dismissal is a final, appeal-able order, but it is not the order appealed from, nor is the defendant aggrieved thereby.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 N.E.2d 1256, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 924, 1997 Mass. App. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-walsh-massappct-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack