Commonwealth v. Wallace
This text of 33 N.E.2d 972 (Commonwealth v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. The defendants were convicted in the Superior Court of unarmed robbery after a trial before a judge and a jury. They moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. After a hearing at which evidence was introduced, the motion was denied. There were no requests for rulings. The defendants excepted to the denial of the motion. Such denial was within the discretion of the judge. No abuse of discretion on other error of law is shown. Commonwealth v. Dascalakis, 246 Mass. 12, 32-33. Commonwealth v. Devereaux, 257 Mass. 391, 394-395. Commonwealth v. Cero, 264 Mass. 264, 272. Commonwealth v. Chin Kee, 283 Mass. 248, 256-257. Commonwealth v. Gwizdoski, 284 Mass. 578, 581.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.E.2d 972, 304 Mass. 680, 1939 Mass. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wallace-mass-1939.