Commonwealth v. Wallace

33 N.E.2d 972, 304 Mass. 680, 1939 Mass. LEXIS 1176
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 7, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The defendants were convicted in the Superior Court of unarmed robbery after a trial before a judge and a jury. They moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. After a hearing at which evidence was introduced, the motion was denied. There were no requests for rulings. The defendants excepted to the denial of the motion. Such denial was within the discretion of the judge. No abuse of discretion on other error of law is shown. Commonwealth v. Dascalakis, 246 Mass. 12, 32-33. Commonwealth v. Devereaux, 257 Mass. 391, 394-395. Commonwealth v. Cero, 264 Mass. 264, 272. Commonwealth v. Chin Kee, 283 Mass. 248, 256-257. Commonwealth v. Gwizdoski, 284 Mass. 578, 581.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Wallace, 33 N.E.2d 972, 304 Mass. 680, 1939 Mass. LEXIS 1176 (Mass. 1939).

33 N.E.2d 972 (Commonwealth v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Fillippini
304 N.E.2d 581 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Commonwealth v. De Christoforo
277 N.E.2d 100 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Robertson
259 N.E.2d 553 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)