Commonwealth v. Tolleson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Tolleson

340 A.2d 428, 462 Pa. 193, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 866

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 7, 1975

DocketNo. 36

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 340 A.2d 428 (Commonwealth v. Tolleson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Tolleson, 340 A.2d 428, 462 Pa. 193, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 866 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

After a full counseled hearing before the Commonwealth Court, an order was entered restraining and enjoining the appellees, James and Rodney Tolleson, from certain violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. The order afforded the parties twenty days within which to file exceptions before becoming final. Since no exceptions were taken, the order became final and no issues were properly preserved for appeal. Pa.R.C.P. 1518, 12 P.S. Appendix. See also Turnway Corporation v. Soffer, 461 Pa. 447, 336 A.2d 871 (Filed April 25, 1975); Rothermel Estate, 461 Pa. 1, 334 A.2d 603 (Filed March 18, 1975); Banes Estate, 461 Pa. 203, 336 A.2d 248 (Filed [195]*195March 18, 1975); Logan v. Cherrie, 444 Pa. 555, 282 A.2d 236 (1971). Cf. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974).

Decree affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

After a full counseled hearing before the Commonwealth Court, an order was entered restraining and enjoining the appellees, James and Rodney Tolleson, from certain violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. The order afforded the parties twenty days within which to file exceptions before becoming final. Since no exceptions were taken, the order became final and no issues were properly preserved for appeal. Pa.R.C.P. 1518, 12 P.S. Appendix. See also Turnway Corporation v. Soffer, 461 Pa. 447, 336 A.2d 871 (Filed April 25, 1975); Rothermel Estate, 461 Pa. 1, 334 A.2d 603 (Filed March 18, 1975); Banes Estate, 461 Pa. 203, 336 A.2d 248 (Filed [195]*195March 18, 1975); Logan v. Cherrie, 444 Pa. 555, 282 A.2d 236 (1971). Cf. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974).

Decree affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 A.2d 428, 462 Pa. 193, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-tolleson-pa-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack