Commonwealth v. Thorne
This text of 299 A.2d 370 (Commonwealth v. Thorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion by
The Commonwealth, appellant in this case, conceded in oral argument before this court that the inad[124]*124missibility of the suppressed evidence would not substantially handicap the prosecution of this case. An examination of the suppression hearing record indicates that this is true. In light of Commonwealth v. Bosurgi, 411 Pa. 56, 63, 190 A. 2d 304 (1963) and Commonwealth v. Pomponi, 436 Pa. 565, 568, 259 A. 2d 872 (1970), such an admission requires that this appeal be quashed without determining the validity of the search.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 A.2d 370, 223 Pa. Super. 122, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-thorne-pasuperct-1972.