Commonwealth v. Thomas

275 A.2d 108, 442 Pa. 111, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 985
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 18, 1971
DocketAppeal, No. 426
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.2d 108 (Commonwealth v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Thomas, 275 A.2d 108, 442 Pa. 111, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 985 (Pa. 1971).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Appellant was arrested and charged with the murder of Helen Whalen. On May 5, 1964, appellant was tried and found guilty of murder in the first degree, and on September 14, 1964 was sentenced to life imprisonment. During his trial, he was represented by counsel.

Appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, and was permitted to file an appeal nunc pro tunc to our Court. Two attorneys were appointed to represent him in the appeal. In Commonwealth v. Thomas, 429 Pa. 227, 239 A. 2d 354, this Court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

Appellant filed a second P.C.H.A. petition, which, after argument, was dismissed by the hearing Judge. Appellant appealed the Order dismissing his second P.C.H.A. petition to our Court, and we affirmed per curiam. Commonwealth v. Thomas, 433 Pa. 608, 248 A. 2d 765. In this hearing and in this appeal, appellant was represented by counsel.

- Appellant filed a third P.C.H.A. petition, which was dismissed after a hearing before the hearing Judge. In this hearing and in the present appeal from the Order dismissing appellant’s third P.C.H.A. petition, appellant was represented by counsel.

Appellant’s principal contention is that he should be awarded a new trial because of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See Com. ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A. 2d 349; Commonwealth v. Woody, 440 Pa. 569, 271 A. 2d 477; Commonwealth v. Skipper, 440 Pa. 576, 271 A. 2d 476.

[113]*113We find no merit in this or in any contention of the appellant.

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Pomeroy concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
235 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Thomas
239 A.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Commonwealth v. Skipper
271 A.2d 476 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Woody
271 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Thomas
248 A.2d 765 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.2d 108, 442 Pa. 111, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-thomas-pa-1971.