Commonwealth v. Standard Investments Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Standard Investments Corp.

472 A.2d 282, 80 Pa. Commw. 649, 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1269

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 8, 1984

DocketAppeal, No. 1791 C.D. 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 472 A.2d 282 (Commonwealth v. Standard Investments Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Standard Investments Corp., 472 A.2d 282, 80 Pa. Commw. 649, 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1269 (Pa. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion By

Judge Rogers,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County dismissing the appellant’s preliminary objections to the appellee’s amended petition for the appointment of viewers alleging a de facto taking of its property and appointing a board of viewers as prayed for by the appellee is affirmed on the comprehensive opinion of Judge Arthur Ed. Saylor reported as Standard Investments Corporation v. Department of Transportation, 28 Pa. D. & C-3d 294 (1982). We emphasize that the court of common pleas, all of whose holdings we have approved, rejected the Department of Transportation’s contention that a landowner, in order to sustain his burden of proving a de facto taking, must have unsuccessfully exposed his property to sale.

Order

And Now, this 8th day of March, 1984, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County in the above-captioned matters is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion By

Judge Rogers,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County dismissing the appellant’s preliminary objections to the appellee’s amended petition for the appointment of viewers alleging a de facto taking of its property and appointing a board of viewers as prayed for by the appellee is affirmed on the comprehensive opinion of Judge Arthur Ed. Saylor reported as Standard Investments Corporation v. Department of Transportation, 28 Pa. D. & C-3d 294 (1982). We emphasize that the court of common pleas, all of whose holdings we have approved, rejected the Department of Transportation’s contention that a landowner, in order to sustain his burden of proving a de facto taking, must have unsuccessfully exposed his property to sale.

Order

And Now, this 8th day of March, 1984, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County in the above-captioned matters is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 A.2d 282, 80 Pa. Commw. 649, 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-standard-investments-corp-pacommwct-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack